1971 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1971 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1971 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 140 kg more than 1971 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Seat 1500 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 1500 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1479 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2601 mm |
