1971 Seat 1500 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1971 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 608 kg more than 1971 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Seat 1500 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Seat | Cadillac |
Model | 1500 | CTS |
Year Released | 1971 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1479 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2880 mm |