1971 Toyota Corona vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (104 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1971 Toyota Corona. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1971 Toyota Corona.
Because 1971 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Toyota Corona | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Corona | A3 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |