1971 Volvo 145 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1971 Volvo 145. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1971 Volvo 145.
Because 1971 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Volvo 145. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Volvo 145 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Volvo | Toyota |
Model | 145 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2601 mm |