1971 Volvo 164 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Volvo 164 (129 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 1971 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Volvo 164 (210 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1971 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Volvo 164 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | 164 | Micra |
Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2449 mm |