1971 Zastava 1300 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 862 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300. 2002 Nissan X-Trail has automatic transmission and 1971 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1971 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan X-Trail will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: