1971 Zastava 1300 vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (74 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: