1971 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Fiat Panda

To start off, 2012 Fiat Panda is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Panda (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Panda weights approximately 145 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Panda (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: