1971 ZAZ 966 vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 ZAZ Wagon (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 ZAZ Wagon weights approximately 5 kg more than 1971 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 ZAZ 966 | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | ZAZ | ZAZ |
Model | 966 | Wagon |
Year Released | 1971 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 885 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 54.5 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2330 mm |