1971 ZAZ 966 vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A6 (440 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1971 ZAZ 966 | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | ZAZ | Audi |
Model | 966 | A6 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 885 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2833 mm |