1972 Abarth A 112 vs. 1967 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1972 Abarth A 112 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1972 Abarth A 112.
Because 1967 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Abarth A 112 | 1967 Volvo P 1800 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | A 112 | P 1800 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |
