1972 Abarth A 112 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 495 kg more than 1972 Abarth A 112.
Because 1980 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Abarth A 112 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | Celica |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |