1972 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 743 kg more than 1972 Abarth A 112.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A 112 | CLK |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 367 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1428 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2780 mm |
