1972 Abarth A 112 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1031 kg more than 1972 Abarth A 112.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Abarth A 112 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |