1972 Abarth A 112 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1228 kg more than 1972 Abarth A 112.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Abarth A 112 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1913 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
