1972 AC 428 vs. 2006 Audi TT
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 234 kg more than 1972 AC 428.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AC 428. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AC 428 (639 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1972 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AC 428 | 2006 Audi TT | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | 428 | TT |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7003 cc | 3189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 298 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 639 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 1668 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |