1972 AC 428 vs. 2009 Audi R8
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1972 AC 428. (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1972 AC 428. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AC 428 weights approximately 539 kg more than 2009 Audi R8.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AC 428. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AC 428 (639 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi R8. (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1972 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AC 428 | 2009 Audi R8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | 428 | R8 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7003 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 298 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 639 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |