1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 (123 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 1750 | Carina |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 82 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
