1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2004 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Zeta (129 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Because 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2004 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
| Model | 1750 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
