1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (163 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Because 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | 1750 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |