1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-05 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (153 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05 should accelerate faster than 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Because 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 1750 | CX-05 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2165 mm |