1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1978 Lancia Beta
To start off, 1978 Lancia Beta is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lancia Beta (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Lancia Beta weights approximately 258 kg more than 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Lancia Beta (165 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. (83 Nm). This means 1978 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1978 Lancia Beta | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | Alfasud | Beta |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1186 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 59 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 59 L |