1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 1951 Bristol 450
To start off, 1972 Alpine A 310 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Alpine A 310 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1951 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alpine A 310 | 1951 Bristol 450 | |
Make | Alpine | Bristol |
Model | A 310 | 450 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 54 L |