1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1972 Alpine A 310 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Alpine A 310 (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 309 kg more than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alpine A 310 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Alpine | Holden |
Model | A 310 | EJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2680 mm |