1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1978 Volvo 240 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Alpine A 310 (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Alpine A 310 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 240 (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alpine A 310 | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A 310 | 240 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2650 mm |