1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (125 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Because 1972 Alpine A 310 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Alpine A 310. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (176 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 1983 Pininfarina Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Alpine A 310 | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
| Make | Alpine | Pininfarina |
| Model | A 310 | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1605 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2450 mm |
