1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,442 cc, 2001 Volvo Hatric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo Hatric weights approximately 626 kg more than 1972 Alpine A 310. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo Hatric (280 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo Hatric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 1972 Alpine A 310 has manual transmission. 1972 Alpine A 310 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Alpine A 310 | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Alpine | Volvo |
| Model | A 310 | Hatric |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1605 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
