1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 685 kg more than 1972 Alpine A 310. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (217 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Alpine A 310 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Alpine | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 310 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1605 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |