1972 Alpine A 310 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Alpine A 310 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 383 more horse power than 1972 Alpine A 310. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1972 Alpine A 310.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Alpine A 310. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1972 Alpine A 310 has manual transmission. 1972 Alpine A 310 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Alpine A 310 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Alpine | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A 310 | CLS |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
