1972 AMC Ambassador vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Ambassador would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Ambassador (220 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Ambassador should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1972 AMC Ambassador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Ambassador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Ambassador (428 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Ambassador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Ambassador | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | AMC | Daewoo |
Model | Ambassador | No 1 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 428 Nm | 137 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |