1972 AMC Ambassador vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Ambassador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1972 AMC Ambassador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Ambassador.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Ambassador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Ambassador (332 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Ambassador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Ambassador | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | AMC | Jeep |
| Model | Ambassador | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4982 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.3 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2630 mm |
