1972 AMC Javelin vs. 1989 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1989 Rover Range Rover is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Javelin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Javelin would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Javelin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1972 AMC Javelin. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Javelin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 644 kg more than 1972 AMC Javelin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Javelin. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover Range Rover (319 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Javelin. (264 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Javelin.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Javelin | 1989 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | AMC | Rover |
| Model | Javelin | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 264 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1342 kg | 1986 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 82 L |
