1972 AMC Javelin vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 1995 Rover 400 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Javelin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Javelin would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Javelin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Javelin (151 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Javelin should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 1972 AMC Javelin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Javelin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Javelin (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Javelin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Javelin | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | AMC | Rover |
Model | Javelin | 400 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2560 mm |