1972 AMC Javelin vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Javelin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Javelin would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Javelin is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Javelin (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Javelin should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 825 kg more than 1972 AMC Javelin.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Javelin (468 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Javelin will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Javelin | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | Javelin | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6571 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |
