1972 AMC Matador vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 77 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 1941 Volvo PV has manual transmission. 1941 Volvo PV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | AMC | Volvo |
Model | Matador | PV |
Year Released | 1972 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |