1972 AMC Matador vs. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 550 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (469 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Matador | Biarritz |
Year Released | 1972 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 469 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |