1972 AMC Matador vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 495 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (469 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1963 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Matador | Sixty |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 469 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 79 L |