1972 AMC Matador vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 600 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (468 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | EJ |
Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2680 mm |