1972 AMC Matador vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1972 AMC Matador is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 1039 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | AMC | DAF |
Model | Matador | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 33 L |