1972 AMC Matador vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1980 Mercury Lynx is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 617 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | AMC | Mercury |
Model | Matador | Lynx |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2400 mm |