1972 AMC Matador vs. 1982 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 304 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica.

Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

1972 AMC Matador 1982 Toyota Celica
Make AMC Toyota
Model Matador Celica
Year Released 1972 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4228 cc 2563 cc
Horse Power 110 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 265 Nm 215 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1484 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 5240 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2640 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]