1972 AMC Matador vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 334 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Matador | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |