1972 AMC Matador vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 935 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | AMC | Zastava |
Model | Matador | 102 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2160 mm |