1972 AMC Matador vs. 1989 Buick Riviera
To start off, 1989 Buick Riviera is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Buick Riviera (165 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Buick Riviera should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Riviera weights approximately 40 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Riviera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Buick Riviera (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1989 Buick Riviera | |
Make | AMC | Buick |
Model | Matador | Riviera |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |