1972 AMC Matador vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 455 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | AMC | Plymouth |
Model | Matador | Sundance |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2470 mm |