1972 AMC Matador vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1989 ZIL 4104 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (255 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (468 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | AMC | ZIL |
Model | Matador | 4104 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 7690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 312 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 607 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105.6 mm | 108 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.4 mm | 104.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3890 mm |