1972 AMC Matador vs. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria
To start off, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria (179 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 346 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1996 Ford Crown Victoria | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Matador | Crown Victoria |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 179 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 37 L |