1972 AMC Matador vs. 1997 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 29 kg more than 1997 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1997 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Matador | DeVille |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1950 mm |