1972 AMC Matador vs. 1998 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Windstar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1998 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 44 kg more than 1998 Ford Windstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1998 Ford Windstar | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Matador | Windstar |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1920 mm |