1972 AMC Matador vs. 1998 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Windstar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Windstar (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Windstar weights approximately 206 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1998 Ford Windstar | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Matador | Windstar |
Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1920 mm |